hybrid 7.0 on freebsd

[Rachel Llorenna]

Since always. They wouldn't dare go near the untested stuff like PaX
or UML-similar stuff.


On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:32:38 -0800, Jack L. <xxjack12xx at doramail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Rachel Llorenna <rachies at gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:14:32 -0500
> > Subject: Re: hybrid 7.0 on freebsd
> > To: Paul-Andrew Joseph Miseiko <esoteric at teardrop.ca>
> >
> >
> > The FreeBSD technology is pretty old. It's of course not a bad thing,
> > FreeBSD is great when you want a stable server over one with a ton of
> > new features. Like programming languages, every operating system seems
> > to have its place. Linux has lots of neat, new features, although it
> > hasn't been tested as thoroughly as FreeBSD. It all comes down to what
> > you intend to use the server for; I wouldn't trust Linux on a
> > production server and would personally opt for FreeBSD. BSD has
> > kevent/kqueue too, which is nice, although I think Linux supports it
> > too (at least my GNU/Linux Debian 3.1 server does..)
> 
> FreeBSD technology pretty old? Since when?
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Get your free email from www.doramail.com with 30 Megs of disk space in webhosting and e-mail storage!
> 
> Powered by Outblaze
> 


-- 
Regards,

Rachel Llorenna (frequency)