watch problems

[Michael]

Of course "WATCH l,L,l,L,l,L ..." is a different thing since it returns 
a full list of clients being offline and online, but that can be fixed 
easily.


Piotr Niżyński wrote:
> Lee H napisał(a):
> 
>> The main problem is you can easily stack watch lists together, ie: 
>> "watch l,l,l,l,l,..." and have the server return you an arbitrarily 
>> sized stream, depending on how many you stack together -- and as this 
>> can be done
>> in a single line any flooding penalties are irrelevant other than sendq.
> 
> 
> [11:27] <Michael_> you can do the same thing with ACCEPT
> [11:27] <Michael_> ACCEPT 1,2,3,4,5,6 etc
> [11:28] <Michael_> with the only difference it returns "no such nick" 
> instead of "x * * 0 is offline"
> 
> 
>