michael at drs-konzept.de
Mon Nov 14 07:29:09 EST 2005
Of course "WATCH l,L,l,L,l,L ..." is a different thing since it returns
a full list of clients being offline and online, but that can be fixed
Piotr Niżyński wrote:
> Lee H napisał(a):
>> The main problem is you can easily stack watch lists together, ie:
>> "watch l,l,l,l,l,..." and have the server return you an arbitrarily
>> sized stream, depending on how many you stack together -- and as this
>> can be done
>> in a single line any flooding penalties are irrelevant other than sendq.
> [11:27] <Michael_> you can do the same thing with ACCEPT
> [11:27] <Michael_> ACCEPT 1,2,3,4,5,6 etc
> [11:28] <Michael_> with the only difference it returns "no such nick"
> instead of "x * * 0 is offline"
More information about the hybrid