<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><div>This is a limitation of CGNAT and not a limitation of Hybrid. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
<div>Thank you,</div><div><br></div><div>Cameron Munroe</div><div>cm@munroenet.com</div><div><br></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Jul 2, 2024, at 8:55 AM, Rat Man <r0d3nt@gmail.com> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div dir="ltr">Hello Hybrid team!<div><br></div><div>Question, in the world of cloud, many hosts are now behind carrier grade NAT. <br><br>It seems that with both the hub and leaf behind carrier grade NAT, I am unable to link. <br><br>Is this a known issue? or do I have a different problem? </div><div><br></div><div>Also FYSA, we've upgraded 2600net to 8.2.44. Runs well, but we're having trouble linking thru NAT clouds. <br><br>Thanks!</div><div><br></div><div>Andrew/RDNt</div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>