cluster suggestion (generic cluster support)
rachies at gmail.com
Wed Feb 9 20:09:31 EST 2005
Hate it or not, the fact remains that it's very useful. I suppose,
though, that it could/should be done client-side... But someone
sometime decided it'd be good to implement it in ircd-hybrid. And I
don't think that the performance hit is terrible, though it does
clutter config files and stuff.
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:53:07 -0800, Jack L. <xxjack12xx at doramail.com> wrote:
> I hate the idea of clustering personally.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rachel Llorenna" <rachies at gmail.com>
> To: "Mailing List: ircd-hybrid" <hybrid at lists.ircd-hybrid.org>
> Subject: cluster suggestion (generic cluster support)
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:32:11 -0500
> > Since most cluster_* functions are nearly identical, wouldn't it be
> > more efficient to create a single, more generic function that could
> > handle all cluster types? I believe ircd-ratbox does this. At the very
> > least, it would reduce the amount of code required while not adversely
> > affecting the performance of ircd-hybrid. This would also make it
> > easier to implement new cluster types.
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Rachel Llorenna (frequency)
> Get your free email from www.doramail.com with 30 Megs of disk space in webhosting and e-mail storage!
> Powered by Outblaze
Rachel Llorenna (frequency)
More information about the hybrid